Here is a proposed Super Bowl ad that is causing a stir and may be considered too sexy to run. What are your thoughts on it? Should it be shown on TV?
http://www.aol.com/article/2015/01/23/new-carls-jr-super-bowl-ad-may-be-their-most-risque-ever/21134142/
FD
Three Clips on ST
3 hours ago
I don't think it is that bad...have seen worse. Quite a bit of this commercial is in the mind of the viewer. The Carl's Jr ad with Paris Hilton where she was sprawled across the car and wet was worse...in my opinion...which, with $1 will get you a cheap cup of coffee. ;)
ReplyDeleteHugs and Blessings...
Cat
I agree. It was kind of clever. Made you think it was much sexier tan it really was.
ReplyDeleteFD
I agree with both of you... it's actually more clever than obscene. The ads for the superbowl are always my favorite part of the day.
ReplyDeleteYes, it a great example of how you can use video to make you think you are seeing something that is not there.
ReplyDeleteFD
i don't think it's bad at all. There have been far worse commercials on television when it comes to indecency. Very clever!
ReplyDeletesissy terri
I agree it was clever.
ReplyDeleteFD
Yes, it is all implied, but it is made to intentionally steer your mind in a certain direction.
ReplyDeleteI don't think it is that clever really. That is not to stay I couldn't pull my eyes away from the screen (LOL), but it is simple really.
Regardless, I would place bets it will get banned.
If it gets banned, they get more publicity.
ReplyDeleteFD